Intellectual Disability

Primary tabs

Information
Phenotype ID: 
915
Date Created: 
Thursday, January 18, 2018
Status: 
Final
Do Not List on the Collaboration Phenotypes List
Structured data: 
ICD10
ICD9
Files: 
Intellectual disability Algorithm.docx
Contact information
Contact Author: 
Lyam Vazquez
Authors: 
CHOP Phenotyping group
Institution: 
CHOP
Network Associations: 
eMERGE
View Phenotyping Groups: 
eMERGE CHOP Group
eMERGE Phenotype WG
Owner Phenotyping Groups: 
eMERGE CHOP Group
Demographics
Gender: 
Female
Male
Age: 
Pediatric
Adult
Race: 
Arctic (Siberian, Eskimo, etc.)
Black (African American, West African, Ethiopian, etc.)
Caucasian (European)
Caucasian (North African, Middle East, Other)
East Asian (Mongol, Tibetan, Korean, Japanese, Thai, etc.)
Indigenous Australian
Mixed Race
Native American
Other Race
Pacific Islander (Polynesian, Micronesian, Hawaiian, etc.)
 

Suggested Citation

CHOP Phenotyping group. CHOP. Intellectual Disability. PheKB; 2018 Available from: https://phekb.org/phenotype/915

Comments

Hi,

About to implement the algorithm. Quick question about the age criteria, "Must be 731 days old or older" , age in reference to what, at the code entry date ?

Thank you for your response, what about for controls, must be 731 days old or older. since they do not have any of those icd codes , their age will be in reference to what ? first visit ? present ?

Hi

When implementing this algorithm against an adult population, does the contraint on well child visits in the controls apply?

Controls Definition

  • Must be 731 days old or older
  • No diagnosis codes for intellectual dissabilities (table 1)
  • No diagnosis codes shown in table 4
  • Must have two or more in person visits after 731 days old
    • Visits must be for well child (pediatrics)

Thanks,

Barbara

Hi,

No, that would be only for pediatric sites. Thanks!

Hello,

about the criteria visits must be for well child for controls , do you have a well child definition ? or do you just add another constraint "age at event <18" ?